Ashanti Region cries foul over neglect under Mahama gov’t

Concerns are mounting within sections of the Ashanti Region over what is increasingly being described as a pattern of neglect and subtle marginalization under the administration of John Dramani Mahama and the governing National Democratic Congress (NDC).

These sentiments, though not universally held, are gaining traction among opinion leaders and residents who believe recent developments reflect a shift in the longstanding relationship between the central government and Asanteman.

At the centre of the controversy is the unfolding chieftaincy tension in Sampa, where the role of Nana Agyemang Badu, Dormaahene has come under intense scrutiny.

Critics allege that his involvement in the dispute has been emboldened by perceived political backing, raising questions about the neutrality of the state in sensitive traditional matters.

While no official confirmation has been made linking the presidency directly to the issue, the perception alone has stirred unease, particularly among those who view chieftaincy institutions as sacrosanct and beyond political interference.

Beyond traditional leadership disputes, attention has also turned to cultural heritage concerns, especially regarding the handling of Kente.

The Ministry of Tourism’s recent engagements around the iconic fabric have been criticised in some quarters as overly politicised, with claims that national symbols are being repurposed in ways that undermine their cultural neutrality and significance.

Developmental concerns have further deepened the conversation. The rollout of national initiatives such as the One Million Coders Programme has sparked dissatisfaction among some residents in the Ashanti Region, who argue that the region has not received a proportionate share of opportunities looking at its contribution to the NDC’s victory.

These concerns have reignited debates over the equitable distribution of national resources and whether all regions are benefiting fairly from government interventions.

Historically, the Ashanti Kingdom—under the leadership of Otumfuo Osei Tutu II—has maintained a prominent and respected role in the socio-political landscape.

During previous administrations, particularly under the New Patriotic Party (NPP), it was common for top government officials to participate in significant traditional events such as the Akwasidae Festival.

These appearances were widely interpreted as gestures of respect and recognition of the authority of the Golden Stool.

Observers now note a perceived decline in such high-level engagements, a shift some interpret as symbolic distancing.

Adding to the unease are past political remarks that have resurfaced in public discourse—comments widely interpreted as dismissive of Ashanti political identity and loyalty.

References suggesting that the allegiance of the Ashanti people could be swayed by trivial incentives have been described by critics as deeply disrespectful, particularly given the region’s historical contributions to democratic development.

While government officials have not formally responded to many of these specific concerns, the broader narrative continues to evolve, driven by public commentary, political debate, and media scrutiny. Analysts caution, however, that perceptions of marginalisation must be carefully examined against empirical evidence to avoid deepening political divisions.